Saturday, May 22, 2021

Mainstream media and politicians are finally calling out Israeli apartheid!

Israel is once again ramping up its ethnic cleansing and murder of Palestinians. Not only that--this time Israel has even targeted the headquarters of international media outlets in order to obscure coverage of its crimes.

May 15:

"An Israeli airstrike on Saturday destroyed a high-rise building that housed The Associated Press office in the Gaza Strip, despite repeated urgent calls from the news agency to the military to halt the impending attack. AP called the strike “shocking and horrifying.”

[...]

“We have had no indication Hamas was in the building or active in the building,” AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt said in a statement. “This is something we actively check to the best of our ability. We would never knowingly put our journalists at risk.”

Pruitt described the news agency as “shocked and horrified that the Israeli military would target and destroy the building housing AP’s bureau and other news organizations in Gaza.” He warned: “The world will know less about what is happening in Gaza because of what happened today.”

[...]

The building housed a number of offices, including those of the Arab satellite channel Al-Jazeera. Dozens of residents who lived in apartments on the upper floors were displaced.

A video broadcast by Al-Jazeera showed the building’s owner, Jawwad Mahdi, pleading over the phone with an Israeli intelligence officer to wait 10 minutes to allow journalists to go inside the building to retrieve valuable equipment before it is bombed.

“All I’m asking is to let four people ... to go inside and get their cameras,” he said. “We respect your wishes, we will not do it if you don’t allow it, but give us 10 minutes.” When the officer rejected the request, Mahdi said, “You have destroyed our life’s work, memories, life. I will hang up, do what you want. There is a God.”"

https://apnews.com/article/israel-middle-east-business-israel-palestinian-conflict-fe452147166f55ba5a9d32e6ba8b53d7

Some have suggested this escalation of Israeli terrorism is an attempt by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold on to power. Over the past few years, his party has had difficulty forming a parliamentary majority, making it uncertain how much longer he will be able to remain Prime Minister. In addition, he was indicted on corruption charges in 2019 and will presumably face trial once the Covid pandemic is deemed under control. The presumption is that, by creating an artificial crisis by escalating violence with Palestinians, he can use the excuse that it is inadvisable to change leaders during a time of crisis. In addition, ramping up the ethnic cleansing will gain him popularity among fiercely tribalist voters (many of whom have received prime real estate in Jerusalem from Palestinians who were recently ethnically cleansed).

What Netanyahu's motives are for this escalation are irrelevant. Israeli apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and settler-colonialism have been ongoing for an entire lifetime now. There have been ebbs and flows in the intensity of the ethnic cleansing, but it has been continuous and unceasing.

More troubling, US support for this rogue nuclear-armed apartheid state has been ongoing for an entire lifetime.

***

Without giving an exhaustive history of the US's relation with Zionism, it is suffice to say that the Zionist lobbying groups have been one of the most powerful political interest groups in the US since their inception.

Since the 1950s, Presidents and other politicians repeatedly attempted to make political groups whose entire purpose is to support Israel register as foreign agents--to no avail. (Meanwhile, groups as benign as the Japan National Tourism Organization and Netherlands Board of Tourism and Conventions are required to register).

In 1967, Israel attacked the USS Liberty as part of a false flag operation. Admiral Thomas Moorer (Chief of Naval Operations--the highest-ranking Naval officer, who serves as head of the Navy--from 1967-1970 and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff--the highest-ranking military officer in the US, serving as an advisor to the President--from 1970-1974), US Secretary of State Dean Rusk (1961-1969), and numerous other military and civilian leaders who have investigated the incident over the past 50 years have rejected the US and Israeli governments' official coverup story of the incident. Nevertheless, politicians, historians, and journalists are expected to accept the alternative facts of the coverup--so powerful is the Israel lobby's hold on the discourse in the US.

Since the creation of Israel, the US has given it over $250 billion dollars in aid, largely in funds explicitly earmarked as military aid. Currently, this is over $3.8 billion per year, despite the fact that Israel is a highly-advanced and nuclear-armed state!

In other words, US taxpayer dollars are directly funding Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing. For reference, the yearly budget NATO member states pay to NATO is less than $2 billion, of which the US and other members pay only a fraction. Yet Trump successfully spread the Russian talking points that the NATO budget was too high! Why aren't more Americans talking about how we have a literal apartheid budget to fund a foreign nation?

$0 is the correct amount of US taxpayer money to send an apartheid state which is actively carrying out an ethnic cleansing. A single penny more is outrageous and too much.

For the longest time, it has been career suicide for journalists or politicians to criticize Israel in the US. Throughout her career, the highly-respected journalist Helen Thomas had at times asked questions as to why the US administration was supporting Israeli tyranny, but she took the gloves off in 2010 and took and firm stance by openly criticizing Zionism. Her career was ended and Zionist groups attempted to tarnish her journalistic legacy.


Now, just a decade later, we have not only multiple mainstream news reporters, but a number of politicians(!), who are willing to state the plain fact that Israel is an apartheid state. The wind of change is here.

Don't forget the tireless work of everyone who made this change possible.

***

This change was quite sudden. Even at the beginning of May, when politicians began meekly criticizing Israel for their renewed campaign of carnage in Gaza, it was almost unthinkable that they would use the term apartheid. Here is an opinion headline from May 9, 2021:

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/5/9/should-palestinians-be-mad-at-aoc


On April 27, the organization Human Rights Watch declared that Israel was an apartheid state. The following morning, this headline was retweeted by Rashida Tlaib:
https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1387389549752553473


Then, it started happening. Heroically led by Tlaib, a wave of politicians and mainstream news sources began using the term apartheid.

May 5:

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1389992893083947012

May 8:

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1391086428852006915

May 10. Tlaib went on an interview and once again called out apartheid.

https://twitter.com/MehdiHasanShow/status/1391895162666815489

https://twitter.com/People4Bernie/status/1391897106927919106

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1391727202006339589


Ilhan Omar was the next politician to join in. A few years ago, Omar courageously stated the fact that US politicians serving on the Foreign Affairs Committee should not be required to put obedience to Israel above their loyalty and duty to the American people. It almost ended her career--both parties wanted to remove her from the committee. But she has stayed strong and every day more people join her in speaking out against Zionist racism and the grip it has over US politics.

May 11:

https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1392298753852383234


On May 13th, a number of Congress members gave speeches criticizing Israel. Some explicitly called it an apartheid state, while others simply implied it.

The entire legislative session from May 13 can be seen in the following video. At 6:10:19 Representative Mark Pocan begins the one-hour session regarding Palestinian issues.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?511625-1/house-passes-comprehensive-debt-collection-improvement-act-215-207

Pocan said Israel "all too often looks like a former South Africa", without explicitly saying apartheid.
https://twitter.com/_waleedshahid/status/1392997006642237440


Tlaib began her speech at 6:14:09 and called out apartheid multiple times.
https://twitter.com/_waleedshahid/status/1392993406318784515


Omar began her speech at 6:25:12 and mentions the Human Rights Watch report called Israel an apartheid state.
https://twitter.com/OmarSShakir/status/1393094591612547077


Representative Ayanna Pressley began her speech at 6:43:12:

"We cannot stand idly and complicitly by and allow the occupation and oppression of the Palestinian people to continue.

We cannot remain silent when our government sends $3.8 billion of military aid to Israel that is used to demolish Palestinian homes, imprison Palestinian children, and displace Palestinian families.

A budget is a reflection of our values.

I am committed to ensuring that our government does not fund state violence in any form, anywhere.

[...]

The question at hand is should our taxpayer dollars create conditions for justice, healing and repair, or should those dollars create conditions for oppression and apartheid?

[...]

If our budgets are a statement of our values, what do we value? Whose lives do we value?"

https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-pressley-delivers-floor-speech-israeli-state-violence-and-human-rights

https://twitter.com/_waleedshahid/status/1392985435547254787


Representative Cori Bush began her speech at 6:52:41:

"We are anti-war. We are anti-occupation. And we are anti-apartheid. Period."

https://twitter.com/RepCori/status/1392991612364591107

(Unfortunately, war may be the only thing capable of ending apartheid and stopping Israeli crimes).


A number of others spoke during this session to criticize Israeli tyranny and the fact that US funds it, but they were not courageous enough to call out apartheid. Many were even cowardly enough to say Israel deserves to exist while at the same time attempting to defend Palestinians. Would Abraham Lincoln, MLK, or BLM declare that a Jim Crow Dixieland has a "right" to exist? No, because justice is incompatible with the existence of apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and the existence of a state which is founded upon tyranny.


On May 14, Tlaib continued.

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1393162154535231488

***

Thanks to Tlaib's unceasing courage, a new milestone occurred on May 15. Mainstream news reporters began calling out apartheid.

On the morning of May 15th (US time), Israel destroyed a building serving as the headquarters of AP news, Al Jazeera, and others.

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1393548019971284992

Instead of silencing news reporters, Israel's deliberate targeting of the media emboldened people to stand against it.

Soon after Tlaib's tweet, news reporter Ali Velshi on MSNBC says:

“Palestinians are at best third-class citizens in the nation of their birth. The idea that it’s even remotely controversial to call what Israel has imposed on Palestinians a form of apartheid is laughable.

Of course, the media wouldn't allow this to be published without him prefacing things by wrongly saying Israel has "right" to exist.

https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/watch/velshi-the-right-to-exist-goes-both-ways-112015941899

The day after this aired, the official MSNBC Twitter retweeted Velshi's segment:

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1394028137445482498

>We may hope that soon, journalists will be able to defend Palestine and speak out against apartheid without pretending like the government implementing the apartheid and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians in the first place has a "right to exist"... (Like, seriously, how does it make any sense to claim to support justice if you say in the same breath that a settler-colonialist apartheid state should be able to exist???)

***

Unfortunately, by the evening of May 15th, the message started getting muddied with poor rhetoric.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted:

"Apartheid states aren’t democracies."

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1393673695433043976

Cori Bush and (unfortunately) Rashida Tlaib soon repeated her statement:

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1393693207792439299


This is such an absurd and counter-productive talking point. Israel IS a democracy. Israel IS an ignoble, tyrannic, and apartheid state. Not in spite of being democratic, but BECAUSE IT IS DEMOCRATIC.

Zionists in Israel vote to continue apartheid and ethnic cleansing, just as tribalists in the US voted to continue slavery, voted to disenfranchise "blacks", and voted to continue the ethnic cleansing of Native Americans. Oh yeah, and US democracy gave us Trump, US democracy has voted to make BDS illegal, and US democracy has voted to give Israel billions of dollars in military funding each year, enabling their crimes...

Moreover, what would happen in a democratic One State Solution? Zionists (including non-Jewish perpetrators of "Zionist privilege" such as "Israeli Arabs") would outvote the Palestinians and we would be right back to where we started from. (I have actually seen many dedicated anti-Zionists who know the One State Solution is the only ethically-justifiable conclusion, yet doubt that it will ever be practical, because they are so Westernized that they are unable to think of the future state of Palestine as anything other than a democracy where millions of Zionists are allowed to vote!)

The Zionist argument that "Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East" should only serve to heighten Israel's obvious ignobility and the fact that democracy is a supremely ethically-unsound form of government.

Democracy is tyranny of the majority. Israel is an excellent example of democracy, and if Israel becomes "more democratic" in the future, it will only continue its apartheid system. Democracy prevented re-establishment of apartheid in South Africa only because "non-whites" were the vast majority and much of the world was committed to boycotting and sanctioning South Africa, preventing the wealthy "whites" from trying to re-seize power.

Meanwhile, democracy in the US gave us slavery, a civil war over the continuation of slavery, Jim Crow (i.e. apartheid), and systematic racism in the police force--with minimal ability for the victims of this tyranny to seek any recourse, since they were the electoral minority!!! Democracy in Israel has consistently supported apartheid and ethnic cleansing, and will continue to do so in the future.

***

Tlaib's other tweets on May 15 were much more focused:


https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1393618761454952454

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1393731483601448960


On May 16th, MSN news patronized AOC for using the term apartheid, causing AOC to double-down on her wording:
https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1393957534663417857

May 16, Omar defends the use of the term apartheid:
https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1394124282645581826

On May 16 the journalist-comedian John Oliver also joined in:

"On Sunday night, John Oliver dedicated the opening portion of his late-night program Last Week Tonight to the ongoing crisis in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories.

[...]

“One side has suffered over 10 times the casualties, something which speaks to both the severe power imbalance at play here and how that often gets obscured by how we choose to talk about it,” said Oliver on his program.

Oliver said he wasn’t going to “try and recap the history” or “propose a solution,” instead vowing to explain why the incidents of the past week were “just wrong.”

Those on the ground, like Palestinian writer and Sheikh Jarrah resident Mohammed El-Kurd, have called it “forced ethnic displacement” conducted by “heavily armed police.” And then there’s the matter of the Iron Dome, Israel’s air defense system that intercepts missiles—and is largely funded by the U.S.

“Israel has a so-called Iron Dome,” explained Oliver, “so the point is, this isn’t tit-for-tat. There is a massive imbalance when it comes to the two sides’ weaponry and capabilities. While most of the rockets aimed toward Israeli citizens this week were intercepted, Israel’s airstrikes were not. They hit their targets, including a house in a refugee camp, a building housing the Associated Press and Al Jazeera, and [a] 13-story office and apartment building. And while Israel insisted that there were military targets in that building and they destroyed it as humanely as possible, even warning people to evacuate it beforehand, destroying a civilian residence sure seems like a war crime, regardless of whether you send a courtesy heads-up text.”

[...]

“They’ve been living under a suffocating blockade for 14 years, and in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, Palestinians are essentially being governed by a form of apartheid—an assessment echoed by both international and Israeli human rights groups,” said Oliver. “Life in Gaza is hard even when they’re not being bombed, and the U.S. government has implicitly co-signed on the brutally hard line Israel’s been taking.”"

https://www.thedailybeast.com/john-oliver-accuses-israel-of-war-crimes-and-apartheid-against-palestinians


On May 17th, Tlaib called out the hypocrisy of Biden and the US for claiming to want a ceasefire, but blocking a UN resolution demanding a ceasefire!

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1394469408249163776

The US's defense of Israel in the UN has been a major international issue and another example of just how strongly Zionist lobbies influence US policy. Since 1972, the US has vetoed at least 53 resolutions critical of Israel:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/5/19/a-history-of-the-us-blocking-un-resolutions-against-israel

The US also famously voted against the 1970s UN resolution which accurately stated the fact that Zionism is racism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_3379



Due to the courage of Tlaib and others, the discourse on Israel and Zionism has now forever changed in America.

Israel is an apartheid state. Zionism is racism. This is now a mainstream political talking point reiterated by at least a dozen mainstream politicians and journalists. There is no longer any excuse for remaining silent.



Those currently speaking out are just the tip of the iceberg.

May 17:

"Rashida Tlaib says Democrats tell her they support Palestine in secret because they’re scared of ‘intimidation’

[...]

US Rep Rashida Tlaib says that some of her Democratic colleagues in Congress express empathy towards the Palestinians in private, but do not in public.

The Michigan Democrat made the observation during an interview on MSNBC’s The Reid Out on Monday evening.

“It is really hard because any of my colleagues that even have some sort of empathy towards Palestinians, they do it quietly with whispering because they continue to be intimidated and bullied by those that want to continue the status quo apartheid in Israel,” Ms Tlaib told host Joy Reid.

[...]

The congresswoman also said there was more criticism of the Netanyahu government within Israel than there was from the Biden administration.

[...]

She joined representatives Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and André Carson of Indiana in signing a joint statement asking president Joe Biden to reconsider the $3bn in annual military aid provided to Israel."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/rashida-tlaib-israel-palestine-democrats-b1849498.html

May 19:

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1395066980676341763


Politicians are afraid of intimidation like this from AIPAC, the strongest pro-Israel lobby in the US (which for some reason isn't required to register as a foreign agent despite literally having Israel in their name).

https://twitter.com/jeremyslevin/status/1394749096020299778

Taking a step back for a moment, if we view people like John Brown and Malcolm X as heroic for fighting back against racist tyranny, why shouldn't we consider Palestinians heroic for fighting back against racist tyranny? If we consider people like Nelson Mandela as heroic for fighting back against South African apartheid, why shouldn't we consider Palestinians heroic for fighting back against Israeli apartheid? (In case you didn't know, Mandela was officially considered a terrorist by the US government until 2008, because beginning in the 1960s he was the leader of the military wing of the African National Congress party, which began a widespread armed guerilla uprising lasting decades against apartheid forces!!!) If American films and novels are filled with portrayals of Native Americans as the heroes for fighting back against US settler-colonialism, why shouldn't we view Palestinians as the heroes for fighting back against Israeli settler-colonialism? The framing of who we think of as the "bad guys" and "good guys" is yet another means by which apartheid supporters control the discourse.

Who are the real terrorists and who are the real anti-terrorists here?

Omar heroically spoke out against the lobby and their grip on US politics in 2019. Not only has she kept her career, but she constantly gains the support of others for being steadfast in her principles and courageous enough to continue speaking out against racism. Other politicians have a duty to join her, instead of remaining silent.

We would not be intimidated by pro-apartheid-South-Africa propaganda, since the position of the apartheid government was utterly evil. MLK, Malcolm X, JFK, and all the other supporters of ending Jim Crow apartheid in the USA were not intimidated by the KKK and other racists. So, why should we be intimidated by Zionists and Israeli apartheid supporters?

We are proudly anti-apartheid and proudly against all forms of racism, which necessitates us being steadfast anti-Zionists. Zionism is a form of racism which is fundamentally no different from the types of White Supremacy which have plagued the US for our entire history.

***

How has President Biden responded to the violence in Israel and the morally-upstanding comments from his party members? Has he recognized the shifting tide of public opinion and his moral duty to stop funding an apartheid state? No, Biden instead has just given Israel an additional $735 million in military aid so they can continue murdering Palestinians. The anti-apartheid caucus has introduced a piece of legislation attempting to stop this $735 million.

Have you paid your taxes yet? This is what your money is going to.

For those of us living in the US, Biden's relative sanity compared to Trump makes him seem like a breath of fresh air. For the Palestinians and others who continue to be murdered thanks to US political, economic, and military support, nothing has changed for the past 70+ years.

Not even 12 hours after Israel supposedly agreed to a ceasefire, Israeli police stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque again... And why wouldn't they, when the US shields them from any international criticism and consequences for their actions, and when Biden just gave them nearly a billion extra dollars as a reward for their actions?

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1395790179609288706

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1395507514377134084

https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1395450244461211648

***
***

What is to be done about all this?

Apartheid South Africa collapsed because of the global movements to boycott, divest, and sanction (BDS)--which was strongly supported by the US government. For example, in 1986, Congress voted 391-104 to override Reagan's veto on the Comprehensive Apartheid Act, which mandated US sanctions against apartheid South Africa. Less than a decade later, apartheid was dismantled. In contrast, when it comes to Israeli apartheid, US political parties have been passing "anti-BDS" laws, Unconstitutionally making it illegal for businesses to attempt to boycott Israel. Since 2015, 35 states have passed such laws, despite over 70% of Americans opposing them.

(Remember this when Zionist propagandists try to tell you the Israel lobby in the US isn't actually powerful, and in the same breath tell you you're a racist for being against apartheid. LOL.)

The fact that BDS worked to stop apartheid South Africa shows that it can work to bring down Israeli apartheid. The fact that Zionist lobbies in the US and elsewhere have desperately attempted to make BDS "illegal" show that it is already working.

In terms of divestment, the first thing the US needs to do is immediately cease giving Israel billions of dollars in yearly military funding to continue their ethnic cleansing. How do we convince politicians to do this? Public outcry against Republican politicians who supported the Coup Vote was enough to get many businesses to stop donating to their campaign funds. The same needs to happen for businesses who donate to Joe Biden and other apartheid supporters. Strategically, this should be focused on the Democrat party and Democratic party politicians--since the Republican party has a near-zero chance of ever turning against apartheid.


As individuals, we have an ethical duty to boycott businesses which do business with Israel or profit in any manner from the exploitation of Palestinians. Here is a targeted list of a select few businesses which are currently being focused on by the main BDS movement website:

https://bdsmovement.net/get-involved/what-to-boycott

Other groups maintain much more extensive lists, such as this one. We encourage you to follow this list as much as you possibly can. However, in order for boycotts to work, they must have a targeted focus and be upheld with consistency by many people. For this reason, at the very minimum you must boycott the organizations whose names are being amplified by the main BDS movement (above), in addition to boycotting organizations currently targeted by local BDS movements in your school, state, city, and region.

http://bdsguide.com/bds-list/


As individuals, we must also band together to threaten to boycott companies unless they cease donating to Biden and other Democratic party apartheid supporters. For example, here are some of the major donors to the Biden campaign:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/17/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-joe-bidens-2020-presidential-campaign/

https://www.investopedia.com/top-donors-to-biden-2020-campaign-5080324


Once this pressure is applied, it may be possible that the political climate begins to change and the US will cease vetoing every UN resolution critical of Israel and derailing international attempts to hold Israel accountable for its crimes. Once this is done, it will be much more difficult for the US to create a pretext to start wars which further Israeli geopolitical goals (see: Iraq, Libya, Syria, and next up: Iran).

But simply hoping that this change will happen spontaneously is not enough. We also need more young and courageous individuals to run for political office and make that change directly! We need others to follow in the footsteps of Americans like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. Tlaib said many Democratic politicians have told her they support Palestine but are too cowardly to come forward. Well, Palestinians cannot wait for these cowards. There is no excuse for elite politicians living a life in wealthy comfort to be "scared" of coming out against apartheid. We will replace you.

And as courageous as Omar and Tlaib are for taking a stand against apartheid, even they come far short of advocating a complete and fundamentally True Left solution to Israel: a heroically autocratic One State of Palestine where Zionists cannot merely vote to re-implement tyranny of the majority, as they most assuredly will in any democratic "solution". Anyone who has studied US history has seen that time and time again, democracy has resulted in nothing but tyranny of the majority.

Any democratic "solution" regarding the future of Israel and Palestine will end up no different than the democratic "solution" the US applied to Native American nations.



One day, Palestine will be free. But this cannot happen without ending US economic, political, and military support for Israel. Nor will it ever happen under a democratic "solution".

Sunday, May 2, 2021

Surprise - Coup supporters in Congress don't want to investigate the coup (and police tyranny isn't over yet either)

In recent news, the hope for an actual Congressional Commission to investigate the January 6th Capitol Coup is basically dead.


More to the point, 147 Republican politicians (over 50% of the party) voted in favor of a coup and are still in Congress. ...Why are Democrats attempting to be "bipartisan" with people who have conspired and committed the highest crimes possible against the state? The Constitution clearly states the punishment for treason is death.

Now, because we have allowed these 147 Republican politicians to continue making our laws with zero punishment, OF COURSE they aren't going to support a "bipartisan" commission to sincerely investigate the fact that their party--in all 3 branches of government--helped organize a coup.

As I have kept saying, if Democrats refuse to hold treasonous members of the government accountable for their role in organizing and inciting the Capitol Coup, then the Democrats are helping Republicans cover up their crimes and are just as complicit in the whole affair.

Any sane person could have told you that trying to get the Republican party on board to investigate their own coup attempt--when a majority of the party supported it and continues to support insurrectionary tactics to hold on to power--would be doomed to fail:

"Back in February, when the idea of a bipartisan commission to study the events of January 6 first arose, it was the opinion around this shebeen that the whole idea was as doomed as Caesar in the Senate, because the Republicans’ complicity in those events would make the “bipartisan” element of any proposed bipartisan commission at best a burlesque, and at worst a tragedy."

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a36165473/january-6-reckoning-republicans/

Worse than the January 6th Commission being shot down is the fact that barely any investigation has been done thus far in Congress, despite the fact that a non-treasonous majority now controls both the House and Senate:

"In the meantime, none of the Democrat-led House panels investigating aspects of the insurrection has made demonstrable headway in documenting contributing factors and assigning blame for the abundant failures that allowed the Capitol to be overrun. None, aside from the House Appropriations Committee, has held hearings with any current or former law enforcement or military officials responsible for coordinating security in D.C. ahead of the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” rally that set off the riot on Jan. 6 and for then reinforcing the Capitol once it was overrun.

Last week, one influential Republican decried the approach taken thus far.

“We’ve skipped a step,” Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.), the House Administration Committee’s ranking minority-party member, complained Thursday as the panel spoke to Capitol Police Inspector General Michael Bolton in the panel’s first public hearing into the events surrounding the insurrection. “This committee has not heard from anybody involved in the decision-making process.”

Other House panels tasked to investigate the riot have not held hearings with any government officials at all, relying instead on the testimony of outside academics and advocates."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/capitol-riot-january-6-commission/2021/04/17/109572e6-9ed9-11eb-9d05-ae06f4529ece_story.html


Despite the Senate being split 50-50 along party lines, it is apparently actually doing investigations, while the House (which contains a clear Democratic party majority) isn't doing much:

"The halting start in the House is perhaps more glaring when compared to the pace of activity in the courts and in other corners of the Capitol.

On Friday, the Justice Department announced it had secured its first guilty plea in cases brought over the Capitol breach, from a founding member of the far-right Oath Keepers group who also agreed to cooperate with investigators against others. Prosecutors have charged more than 400 people in connection with the attack.

In the Senate, a two-panel investigation has already held public hearings with leading police, National Guard and Justice Department officials, and the sergeants at arms responsible for riot-response plans. The Senate Rules and Homeland Security committees are expected to release a report of their findings and conclusions by next month.

That joint probe continues to function harmoniously despite simmering tension between leading Democrats and Republicans over scheduling additional witness testimony, particularly from relevant political and military officials who were at the Pentagon on Jan. 6."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/capitol-riot-january-6-commission/2021/04/17/109572e6-9ed9-11eb-9d05-ae06f4529ece_story.html

In case you need a refresher on what happened during the Capitol Coup and just how severe it was, see the posts below. Insurrectionists were directed by the President. Insurrectionists were minutes away from murdering politicians. Insurrectionists murdered a police officer and severely injured countless more. Multiple Republican politicians have been observed as giving "reconnaissance tours" to individuals the day before the insurrection and multiple Republican politicians worked directly with riot-organizers to give them insider information. Then, hours after the insurrection ended, a majority of Republican politicians voted in favor of the coup by voting to overturn the results of the election.

https://authenticamericandream.blogspot.com/2021/01/trump-incites-insurrection-urges-supporters-storm-the-capitol.html

https://authenticamericandream.blogspot.com/2021/01/trumps-insurrection-was-inside-job.html

And. These. Politicians. Faced. No. Punishment. They are still making our laws. The Democrat party is acting like their hands are tied and are trying to negotiate with literal terrorists for a "compromise" that works for both of them. Meanwhile the Republican party is planning their next coup attempt--since they faced zero repercussions and have openly embraced the strategy of insurrection.

The ineptitude of the Democrat party is mind-boggling.

***

It has been obvious from the beginning that the Capitol Coup was an inside job.

This was fully confirmed in early March when Trump State Department employee Federico G. Klein (who held a Top Secret security clearance!) was arrested for his participation in the coup. I have been meaning to write an article on Klein's arrest, given the extreme significance of his involvement in the coup and also the fact that investigations were at one point proceeding rapidly enough to arrest him, but I have not had an opportunity.


Now, Pelosi has already given in to pressure from Republicans and is willing to back their plan for a "balanced" commission--where half of the investigators were coup participants. Republicans even want to change the main scope of the January 6th Commission so that it doesn't even primarily focus on the January 6th Coup! Apparently Pelosi hasn't agreed to change the scope of the investigation yet, but what hope do we have that this Commission will amount to anything when she is already willing to let A PARTY WHICH OPENLY CONTINUES TO SUPPORT THE CAPITOL COUP AND FUTURE INSURRECTION investigate themselves???

What we need is an actual Crimes Commission to investigate every single last member of Congress who gave aid and comfort to terrorists during the Capitol Coup, and lock them up. Anything less than a Crimes Commission where POLITICIANS WHO COMMITTED TREASON face legal punishment (not merely expulsion from Congress, but life in prison/execution) means that the Democratic party is actively helping the Republican party cover up their crimes and setting the stage for their next coup.

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is renewing her push for a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, floating a new proposal to Republicans that would evenly split the panel’s membership between the two parties.

Pelosi first proposed a commission in February that would have had four Republicans and seven Democrats to “conduct an investigation of the relevant facts and circumstances relating to the domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol.” Republicans rejected it as inadequate.

[...]

It’s unclear if the two sides will ever agree. Some Republicans allied with Trump have downplayed the severity of the insurrection and think the probe should look more broadly at unrest in the country. It’s a symptom not just of the partisan tensions that run high in Congress, but of a legislative branch reeling from the Trump era, with lawmakers unable to find common ground, or a common set of facts, even after a violent assault on their institution.

[...]

The Republicans said the investigation should focus not just on what led to the Jan. 6 insurrection but also on violence in the summer of 2020 during protests over police brutality — a touchstone among GOP voters and an idea that Democrats say is a distraction from the real causes of the violent attack.

On Tuesday, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said he’d had no discussions with Pelosi. He said the commission needed to have a partisan balance but also the scope of the investigation needed to be broader than just the insurrection.

“We’ve also had a number of violent disturbances around the country last year, and I think we ought to look at this in a broader scope and with a totally balanced 9/11 style commission,” McConnell told reporters.

[...]

McCarthy’s office said in a statement that “hopefully the Speaker has addressed our basic concerns of equal representation and subpoena authority” for Republicans on the panel.

Pelosi has said repeatedly that she will not concede to the Republican demands on the scope.

“It’s not about examining Black Lives Matter,” Pelosi said last week. “It’s about what happened on Jan. 6 and how we can prevent it from happening again.”"

https://wtop.com/congress/2021/04/pelosi-floats-new-proposal-for-bipartisan-jan-6-commission/

***

Some in the mainstream media are at least willing to state the obvious about the ongoing Republican party sabotage of the government:

"We Can't Be Held Hostage to a Political Party That Has Lost Its Mind

We need to reckon with January 6 whether or not Republicans are prepared to participate.

[...]

Our politics can never truly move forward on anything until there is a final and complete reckoning of the only organized mob coup d’etat in the country’s history. The longer that reckoning is delayed, the harder it’s going to be for the country and its politicians to recover public confidence in the government’s institutions, without which self-government itself is a limping, spavined farce. If the Democratic congressional majorities have to go it alone, then they should. If Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice needs to be the venue for that reckoning, then so be it. It’s too important to be hostage to a party that has lost its mind, and that’s funding its operation on the public’s mania."

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a36165473/january-6-reckoning-republicans/

Remember when mainstream news outlets would publish tons of stories and generate tons of outrage over things as insignificant as every Trump Tweet? Now we a much more juicy and insane story--a government being held hostage by a party which just attempted to overthrow the government in a bloody coup. A party which remains openly supportive of insurrection.

Why aren't more media outlets shouting the obvious statements in the quoted paragraph above? Perhaps it's because we would be forced to confront the fact that democracy has always just been tyranny of the majority and is fundamentally incapable of securing liberty and justice for all. It is fundamentally incapable of fairly governing a nation, incapable of promoting the general welfare, incapable of even implementing the most basic of so-called "rights" and bureaucratic procedures explicitly stated in the Constitution.

Don't believe me? If slavery and Jim Crow weren't enough to convince you--ONE OF THE TWO MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES ORGANIZED A BLOODY COUP. 147 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS VOTED IN FAVOR OF A COUP, FACED NO PUNISHMENT, AND ARE STILL IN CONGRESS MAKING OUR LAWS. TERRORISTS ARE MAKING OUR LAWS. DEMOCRATS ARE ALLOWING TERRORISTS TO HOLD OUR NATION HOSTAGE AND MAKE OUR LAWS.

And the voters love it. Republican voters and politicians are still head-over-heels for Trump and it isn't changing any time soon.

"Three months after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, the Republican Party still won’t fully renounce it. In Congress, Republicans are opposing an investigation of the attack unless other incidents are included. On Friday, sponsors of a conference at former President Donald Trump’s Miami resort proudly displayed photos of the crowd that had gathered before the attack. On Saturday, Republican donors cheered as Trump boasted about the Jan. 6 crowd and complained that his allies should have fought harder to prevent the certification of his defeat.

In recent weeks, numerous Republican lawmakers have belittled the attack, defended the mob that precipitated it (Sen. Ron Johnson called them “people that love this country”), voted against a resolution condemning it, or accused liberals of overreacting to it. In February, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, speakers blamed a “rigged election” for provoking the rioters. But the sickness goes deeper. The Republican base is thoroughly infected with sympathies for the insurrection.

In polls taken shortly after Jan. 6, roughly 15 percent of Republicans openly endorsed the rebellion. They did so even when survey questions explicitly called it an “attack,” “storming,” and “taking over” the Capitol. But other questions found broader support. Twenty-three percent of Republicans agreed that “in America today … it can be acceptable for people to use force or violence to try to achieve political goals.” Forty-two percent, when asked about the people who “took over” the Capitol, said they were “mostly peaceful.” Forty-five percent rejected the notion that “those who participated in the storming of the Capitol” were “criminals.” Instead, this half of the Republican base chose an alternative description of the invaders: “They went too far, but they had a point.” Fifty-one percent of Republicans said the party’s leaders “did not go far enough” on Jan. 6 to overturn the election. Only 27 percent called the attack terrorism, and only 19 percent called it a coup attempt.

These sentiments don’t seem to have waned. Since January, the share of Republicans who insist that President Joe Biden did not “legitimately win the election,” nearly 80 percent of the GOP, has hardly budged. Nearly two-thirds of Republicans say Trump won the election, and nearly 30 percent say they’ll “never accept” Biden as president. Two weeks ago, by a two-to-one ratio, Republicans reaffirmed their view that the election was “stolen” from Trump. Last week, 70 percent said there had been enough fraud to change the election’s outcome."

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/04/republican-party-sympathize-capitol-insurrection.html

Right now, the Arizona state Republican party is trying to recount the votes in the 2020 election. This action is purely symbolic, in order to demonstrate their continued commitment to the Republican party's embrace of coup attempts. Even if Arizona were to turn red, Biden would still win. Besides, the courts have already settled all election-related challenges brought by Trumpists. (Additionally, by suggesting the results of the election were illegitimate, these politicians are suggesting their seats are illegitimate, since they were voted in via the results of the election...)

Recall that Arizona Republicans were at the epicenter of organizing the Capitol Coup. The Arizona Proud Boys were the group who spearheaded the breach of the Capitol itself, and Arizona Representatives Gosar and Biggs worked directly with Ali Alexander to organize details of the coup, including its timing.

"The state senate-ordered election audit started last Friday and is being carried out by a Florida-based security company called Cyber Ninjas, which has no election experience.

Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan is overseeing the election audit, despite spreading a bizarre conspiracy theory that a company tied to long-dead Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez rigged voting machines against former President Donald Trump in November (Cyber Ninjas did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Forbes).

[...]

There are also concerns about the privacy of ballots, with Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Martin saying he was "not yet persuaded" privacy was being protected during a hearing Tuesday involving a lawsuit from the state Democratic Party seeking to block the audit.

[...]

Ballots are only being counted from Maricopa County—by far the most populated county in the state, and home to Phoenix and its sprawling suburbs. They're also only looking at the results in the presidential election and the U.S. Senate race, both of which were won by Democrats.

The recount is being driven by Trump's false claims that widespread voter fraud cost him winning a second term as president. But a recount of around 8,000 ballots after Election Day in Arizona found no evidence to back up Trump's claim, nor did recounts in other states. Still, Trump said he's monitoring the recount in Arizona and predicts "the results will be startling!""

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2021/04/29/theyre-still-counting-but-heres-why-arizonas-election-recount-is-causing-concern/

Republican House leader Kevin McCarthy is now actively defending Trump for his role in inciting the insurrection, even though on the day of the insurrection itself he pleaded with Trump to call it off and subsequently blamed Trump for inciting it.

"McCarthy initially said Trump “bears responsibility” for the riot and admitted the then-president was too slow to respond.

“He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding,” McCarthy said a week after the insurrection.

But on Sunday, he changed his tune completely, telling Fox News that Trump promised to help stop the violent attack on the Capitol carried out by his supporters.

“And that’s what he did,” McCarthy said. “He put a video out later.”

Trump waited hours to release the video, eventually telling the rioters “we love you” as he asked them to go home.

On Sunday, McCarthy wouldn’t answer a question about a report claiming his conversation with Trump during the riot didn’t go nearly as well as he indicated.

Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) said McCarthy told her that when he asked Trump to stop the attack, the then-president replied: “Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.”"

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kevin-mccarthy-coward-fox-news-trump_n_6086641de4b09cce6c133b95

Day after day, the Republican party reaffirms their commitment to the Capitol Coup and the strategy of organizing insurrections and coups to hold on to power at all costs. And, meanwhile, the Democratic party is trying to negotiate with terrorists who tried to murder them! These are not "good faith" negotiations. The Democrat party is trying to work with terrorists and trying to help them cover up their crimes, thereby enabling them to organize insurrections and coups in the future. This is the opposite of "bipartisanship" and good faith...

***

Given the fact that the Republican party is openly insurrectionary and will attempt a coup again in the future, given the fact that the Democratic party is legalizing all the Trump administration and Republican party's crimes by refusing to hold them accountable, given the fact that 147 Congress members who voted in favor of a coup faced no consequences and continue making our laws, given the fact that White Supremacist police and non-police can murder us while we lay in bed and get away with it, and much, much more, LEFTISTS AND "NON-WHITE" AMERICANS NEED TO BEGIN ARMING THEMSELVES IMMEDIATELY.

When one of the major political parties is openly insurrectionary and came within minutes of seizing the government on their latest coup attempt, we are not safe. When the other major political party refuses to hold these criminals responsible and thereby ensures they will repeat their tactics in the future, we are not safe. When police can murder citizens in their bed with no consequences, we are not safe.

The stated goal of far-right groups like QAnon were a complete Soviet-style purge of all left-wing Americans once Trump gave the signal to begin "The Storm". The stated goal of many White Supremacist groups has for decades been the "Day of the Rope" where all "non-whites" and "whites" who stand in the way are murdered. That is not fear mongering or exaggeration, that's genuinely what millions of people desire--and they came close to setting it in motion.

And even without those doomsday scenarios, tyrannical police can just murder us and get away with it unless faced with massive sustained ideological protests and unideological rage-induced rioting that cannot be quelled unless something is done. Meanwhile, the Democrat party welcomes the "sacrifice" of our lives without bothering to do anything to fix the corrupt cancer that is killing our nation!!! How many more of us will be condemned as blood sacrifices by our politicians until they bother to pass laws throwing out the rotten system that enables these sorts of things? For the love of god, these politicians were within a literal minute of being murdered by insurrectionists who were directly aided by their colleagues and even that is not an enough of an impetus for them to do something--anything--to set our nation on a better course?

Attorney General Garland recently announced a probe into the Minneapolis police force and Louisville police force (who killed Breonna Taylor) but how many times have we heard similar things, only to get no substantial results?


...And reforming the Minneapolis police won't do anything to address the corruption in places like Chicago, where police recently murdered unarmed 13-year-old Adam Toledo. The prosecutor for the case even lied and said he was holding a gun, despite the video of the incident clearly showing he did not have one! Breonna Taylor was murdered over a year ago and her killers may never even face a murder trial. How many other victims never received justice?


Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison: "I would not call today's verdict justice, however—because justice implies restoration. But it is accountability."
— ABC News (@ABC) April 20, 2021

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1384623239260000258

Chauvin's guilty verdict and Garland's Minneapolis probe are only the first steps out of 10,000 more that need to be done before actual justice can result. Right-wing media is already painting Chauvin as a martyr and the victim of an unfair judicial system. (Wtf, more unfair than being executed without trial for the alleged crime of using a counterfeit 20 dollar bill?)

If we act like the battle is now over, like victory has been achieved, and then tune out, our complacency will merely pave the way for the next Chauvin to face no consequences.

***

Turning our attention back to the danger of insurrectionary far-right militias for a moment, left-wing Americans are dramatically outgunned compared to right-wingers in the US. Worse, "non-white" Americans are even more dramatically outgunned compared to "whites". We need to begin arming ourselves (legally), training, and organizing community solidarity groups so we can defend ourselves and our communities against tyranny now and in the future.

Surprisingly, some politicians appear to be heading in the correct direction, but are far from reaching a satisfactory position. Breaking curfew to hold up cardboard signs means nothing when police can murder us for no reason and when police give aid and comfort to rightists who go out to hunt protestors (e.g. Rittenhouse) and even allow heavily-armed far-right militias to set up weapons overlooking left-wing protestors. What good are cardboard signs after the damage has already been done, just to rinse and repeat every time we let something like this happen?

"Rep. Maxine Waters on Saturday night called for protesters to "stay on the street" and "get more confrontational" if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted in the killing of George Floyd.

[...]

"We've got to stay in the street and demand justice," Waters said to reporters, according to video posted on social media.

"We're looking for a guilty verdict and we're looking to see if all of the talk that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd. If nothing does not happen, then we know that we got to not only stay in the street, but we have got to fight for justice," she added.

Asked what protesters should do if there is no guilty verdict, Waters said protests should continue. "We got to stay on the street. And we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business," she said.

Asked about the curfew put in place, Waters said, "I don't think anything about curfew. Curfew means I want you all to stop talking. I want you to stop meeting. I want you to stop gathering. I don't agree with that.""

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics/maxine-waters-derek-chauvin-trial/index.html

Cell phone video from a 17-year-old community member was critical in convicting Chauvin. But that didn't stop Floyd from being murdered. If the community had armed patrols (who carried weapons in compliance with the law), could Floyd still be alive? During the Counterculture era, the Black Panthers and other groups created (100% legal) armed community patrols in response to police tyranny, causing safety to rise as police thought twice about murdering citizens. Recall--by law you are allowed to use lethal force to protect someone else's life from being unlawfully taken!

***

It's been 4 months since the Capitol Coup. That means Republicans and far-right militias have already had 4 months to examine what went wrong and to plan their next moves. The clock is ticking down until they attempt something again, because the Republican party has continued to reaffirm its support for insurrectionary tactics and the Democratic party has refused to uphold the laws to hold them accountable for their crimes. We have to prepare to defend ourselves and our communities from the tyranny that will inevitably unfold in the future.

Although it might seem like life has somewhat gone back to normal now the media has calmed down from their Trump mania now that Biden is in office, things haven't "gone back to normal" when 147 law makers who are still serving in Congress voted to overthrow the government. Things can't just "go back to normal" when one of the major political parties in our nation is openly supportive of insurrection and coups to hold on to power, and when the other major political party refuses to hold them accountable for their treason.


We can't allow ourselves to be placated by Chauvin's guilty verdict when Breonna Taylor, Adam Toledo, and thousands of others may never get justice--and when thousands of more victims will inevitably be created in the future, since no changes have been made to address the root of all the injustice. We must (legally) arm ourselves, train, and prepare to defend ourselves and our communities from continued far-right terrorism.

It seems like every lifetime, we have to go through this same cycle...

Saturday, March 27, 2021

Resist Georgia's new, new Jim Crow!

In recent news, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp signed an extreme voter suppression law which bans people from giving water to voters waiting in line. That part of the law has been making headlines, but it's actually much worse than that. This law allows the (Republican-controlled) Georgia legislature to have control over certifying the state's elections, increases their ability to change voting rules, and even allows the state legislature to remove local-level election officials and delay certification at the last moment.

"The new law basically codifies Trump’s grievances against Republican officials in the state who resisted his efforts to overturn the election there. You’ll recall that Georgia’s current Secretary of State, Brad Raffensberger, became the target of Trump’s fury when he deflected pressure from the former president to “find” enough votes to reverse his loss in the state. The new law strips the secretary of state, Georgia’s top elections official, of his seat and his role as chair of the state election board, and endows the state legislature with the power to fill three of that board’s five seats — essentially giving the legislature control over the certification of elections and voting rules in the state. The new law also empowers the state election board to suspend or replace local election officials and delay certification, making it potentially easier for them to meddle with results."
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/georgia-voting-bill-brian-kemp-voter-suppression-1147493/

The part about banning handing out water to voters highlights how extremely unethical the law is and will also be an easy way to get people riled up to defy and protest this unjust and Unconstitutional law, but Republicans want to distract us so we stop just short of realizing the true intent of the law.

"The measure was signed into law by Governor Brian Kemp, a Republican, on Thursday evening. “Significant reforms to our state elections were needed. There’s no doubt there were many alarming issues with how the election was handled, and those problems, understandably, led to a crisis of confidence,” Kemp said during prepared remarks shortly after signing the bill.
[...]
It requires voters to submit ID information with both an absentee ballot request and the ballot itself. It limits the use of absentee ballot drop boxes, allows for unlimited challenges to a voter’s qualifications, cuts the runoff election period from nine to four weeks, and significantly shortens the amount of time voters have to request an absentee ballot.
[...]
The legislation also empowers the state legislature, currently dominated by Republicans, to appoint a majority of members on the five-person state election board. That provision would strip Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who stood up to Trump after the election, from his current role as chairman of the board. The bill creates a mechanism for the board to strip local election boards of their power.

Gloria Butler, a Democratic state senator, said the bill would make it harder to vote, especially for poor and disabled people. “We are witnessing a massive and unabashed assault on voting rights unlike anything we’ve seen since the Jim Crow era,” she said just before the bill passed.
[...]
Protesters outside the state Capitol called the bill “Jim Crow 2.0”, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported.
[...]
They offered little substantive justification for why the measure was necessary after an election in which there was record turnout, and in which multiple recounts found no evidence of fraud. Instead, they said the bill was necessary to preserve voter confidence.

The nearly 100-page measure was only formally unveiled last week, when it was abruptly inserted into another two-page bill. While the legislation includes several of the measures lawmakers debated, it included some new ideas that had not been fully debated. Democrats and voting activists have accused Republicans of trying to ram through a bill without fully vetting it.

Democrats and voting rights groups are expected to file lawsuits challenging the measure."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/25/georgia-voting-restrictions-law-passed

***

To make clear the symbolism behind signing the bill, Kemp signed it under a portrait of a slave plantation, while "black" Georgia state Representative Park Cannon was arrested for simply knocking on the door while he was signing the bill behind closed doors.


Oh, and Georgia is the last state to still fly the flag of an enemy nation.

...And how did Kemp become Governor? In 2018 Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp was in charge of his state's voter rolls while running for Governor--a massive conflict of interest. Not surprisingly, over 340,000 Georgians had their voter registration improperly cancelled under Kemp leading up to the election. Kemp narrowly beat Stacey Abrams by less than 55,000 votes in the election for Governor. 

Stacey Abrams' tireless work during the 2020 election was able to turn Georgia blue in the 2020 Presidential vote as well as deliver both critical Senate seats to the blue team. In response to this surprising outcome, Republicans in Georgia and the rest of the US introduced over 100 bills to suppress voters--and that was only within the first two months of 2021!

Republicans even had the nerve to argue in front of the Supreme Court that they needed to suppress voters because that's the only way Republicans could win elections:

"Arizona GOP lawyer tells Supreme Court the party needs certain voting restrictions to compete with Democrats

The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard oral arguments by Arizona Republicans in defense of two voting restrictions they are looking to keep intact. At one point, Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked Michael Carvin, a lawyer representing the Arizona GOP, what the party's interest in maintaining the policy of discarding ballots cast at the wrong precinct was. Carvin answered, without hesitation, that removing the rule would prevent Republicans from competing in the state.

"It puts us at a competitive disadvantage relative to Democrats," he told Barrett. "Politics is a zero sum game. Every extra vote that they get through unlawful interpretations of Section 2 hurts us. It's the difference between winning an election 50-49 and losing an election."
"
https://news.yahoo.com/arizona-gop-lawyer-tells-supreme-200813978.html

This is a sentiment Kemp and many other rightists have echoed:
"Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State and the Republican nominee for Georgia governor, expressed at a ticketed campaign event that his Democratic opponent Stacey Abrams’ voter turnout operation “continues to concern us, especially if everybody uses and exercises their right to vote,” according to audio obtained by Rolling Stone."

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/brian-kemp-leaked-audio-georgia-voting-745711/


I think the symbolism of signing the bill in front of a slave plantation tells us all we need to know about the intentions of Republicans who supported the bill..

Mississippi recently removed the Confederate flag from their state flag, signalling they are at least willing to consider turning over a new leaf and beginning the healing process from the legacy of slavery and the racist culture of Dixie. Meanwhile, Georgia is doubling down on its White Supremacy.

View the following links for more information on the Callaway Plantation in the painting:

https://twitter.com/Will_Bunch/status/1375434696671256581

https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/georgia-governor-brian-kemp-painting-slave-plantation-20210326.html

"The promotional sites gloss over the fact that by the time of the Civil War, the Callaway Plantation only thrived because of the back-breaking labor of more than 100 slaves who were held in cruel human bondage.

The harsh reality of life for slaves in the era of the Callaway Plantation is captured in this oral-history "slave narrative" of Mariah Callaway, a woman who was born into slavery on the plantation in 1852. In her account, she notes that "...[T]here were some slaves who were unruly; so the master built a house off to itself and called it the Willis jail. Here he would keep those whom he had to punish. I have known some slaves to run away on other plantations and the hounds would bite plugs out of their legs.”"

***

Trump and 147 Republican members of Congress attempted to obstruct the counting of electoral votes by planning and carrying out an insurrection, murdering a police officer and wounding countless more in the process. The terrorists they incited chanted "Hang Mike Pence" and some carried zip tie handcuffs to take members of Congress hostage. So far, these politicians who participated in a bloody coup have faced no punishment and continue making laws for the nation... Meanwhile, Representative Park Cannon gets arrested immediately for calmly knocking on a door.

"We will not live in fear and we will not be controlled," Cannon wrote. "We have a right to our future and a right to our freedom."

Georgia U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock, a Democrat, visited Cannon in jail and contrasted her arrest with the treatment of Trump supporters who led a deadly siege on the U.S. Capitol in January to disrupt the counting of electoral votes.

"I want to know what makes her actions so dangerous, and the actions of those who were trying to undermine an actual election so benign in the minds of some politicians," Warnock told reporters. "She did not deserve this."
[...]
President Biden indirectly called out Georgia in his first press conference, alluding to its voting bills and calling GOP voting restrictions "sick" and "un-American.""

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/park-cannon-arrested-georgia-voting-restriction-bill-protest/
 

Watch the video of her calmly knocking on the door, not "pounding" it:

https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000007676451/georgia-representative-cannon-arrest-voting-access.html

"Cannon faces two felony charges -- felony obstruction and preventing or disrupting general assembly session, according to an arrest affidavit seen by CNN. The affidavit states that Cannon was charged with disrupting General Assembly session because she "knowingly and intentionally did by knocking the governor's door during session of singing [sic] a bill."

The arrest affidavit for the felony obstruction charge said she "did knowingly and willfully hinder Officer E. Dorval and Officer G. Sanchez of the Capitol PD, a law enforcement officer in the lawful discharge or the officer's official duties by Use of Threats of Violence, violence to the person of said officer by stomping on LT Langford foot three times during the apprehension and as she was being escorted out of the property. The accused continued on kicking LT Langford with her heels."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/park-cannon-georgia-state-lawmaker-arrested-protesting-voting-restriction-bill-outside-governors-office/ar-BB1eYxxF


Arrested for doing her bare-minimum duty as a politician.

***

Now, let's look at the actual law itself, to show that it is in fact not hyperbole that it forbids handing out water to citizens trying to vote.

Section 33.

(a)  No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector...

(1)  Within 150 feet of the outer edge of any building within which a polling place is established;
(2)  Within any polling place; or
(3)  Within 25 feet of any voter standing in line to vote at any polling place.

(e)  This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit...from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to an elector waiting in line to vote.

Considering that voters in predominately "black" districts are disenfranchised by having considerably fewer polling places available than in predominately "white" districts, thereby facing hours of waiting in line, the racist intent of this soulless law cannot be hidden. Ever since 2013, when the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Jim Crow-style voting laws in Dixie states have come roaring back.

"This country has a long history of disenfranchising and suppressing the votes of people of color, particularly in the South. But in 2013 the voter suppression efforts of yesteryear came roaring back. That's when the Supreme Court gutted key provisions in the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Those provisions had stopped states with histories of voter suppression from changing their election laws without an okay from the federal government.

Let's take a look at how that shameful decision has played out over the years, shall we?

Today's voter suppression often takes the form of purging eligible voters from the rolls, cutting back early and absentee voting, closing polling places, and using strict voter ID requirements – disenfranchising voters of color at every turn.

Voter roll purges have become increasingly common.

Officials purged nearly 4 million more names between 2014 and 2016 than between 2006 and 2008 — a 33 percent increase. Officials in states that used to be under federal oversight purged voters from the rolls at a rate 40 percent higher than those in states with no history of voter suppression.

As it turns out, Chief Justice John Roberts was dead wrong when he argued "things have changed dramatically" in the South.


Election officials in Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, and Virginia have all conducted illegal voter roll purges. In Virginia in 2013, nearly 39,000 voters were removed from the rolls when state officials relied on a faulty database – removing voters who had supposedly moved out of the state.

Even if you make it past a voter roll purge, you may get stuck in endlessly long lines to vote.

Since the Voting Rights Act was gutted in 2013, 1,688 polling places have been shuttered in states previously bound by the Act's preclearance requirement. Texas officials closed 750 polling places. Arizona and Georgia were almost as bad. Not surprisingly, these closures were mostly in communities of color.


In Texas, officials in the 50 counties that gained the most Black and Latinx residents between 2012 and 2018 closed 542 polling sites, compared to just 34 closures in the 50 counties that gained the fewest Black and Latinx residents. In Georgia's 2020 primary, 80 polling places were closed in Atlanta, home to Georgia's largest Black population — forcing 16,000 residents to use a single polling place.

And even if you get to a polling place after standing for three hours to cast your ballot, you may end up being turned away because of a restrictive voter ID law.
[...]
In Georgia, the state's restrictive "exact match" ID law — requiring a voter's ID to exactly match the name on their registration, down to any dots or dashes — allowed state officials to throw out 53,000 majority-Black voter registrations less than a month before the state's tight 2018 gubernatorial race. Stacey Abrams, who would have been the country's first Black woman governor, lost the election by just under 55,000 votes — after years of her rival Brian Kemp systematically suppressing the votes of people of color.

Meanwhile, in North Carolina, a court found that the state's voter ID law "target[ed] African Americans with almost surgical precision," and struck the law down in its entirety. Imagine all we could accomplish with all the time, money, and resources that go into prolonged legal battles against these discriminatory laws that should never have seen the light of day in the first place."
https://www.salon.com/2020/10/25/what-happened-to-the-voting-rights-act_partner/


Again, it gets much more evil than the water issue. Remember how during the 2020 election Republicans kept saying only the (Republican-controlled) legislatures should be able to control the rules for voting and vote certification? Well, they are certainly following through on their threats, giving themselves even more power to suppress voters.

"Under the proposal, the Republican-controlled State Election Board would be able to replace struggling county election boards and install new management, with broad authority over elections and results.

State takeovers of local election offices could change the outcome of future elections, especially if they’re as hotly contested as last year’s presidential race between Democrat Joe Biden and Republican Donald Trump. County election boards decide on challenges to voters’ eligibility, polling place closures and certification of results.
[...]
The county at the top of the list for potential state intervention is Fulton County, the heavily Democratic population center of metro Atlanta that Republicans blame for their statewide losses.

Critics of the proposal say it would usurp authority from county election boards, often run by volunteers appointed by each political party or county commissions. The bill calls for one person appointed by the state to oversee a county’s election operations.
[...]
Both bills would allow the State Election Board to seek the removal of county election boards for poor performance. The measure that cleared the House goes further. It would remove the secretary of state as the chairperson of the State Election Board and replace him with an appointee of the General Assembly. That would give a majority of the board to the General Assembly, which already appoints two of its members."
https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia-bill-would-shift-power-over-elections-to-gop-appointees/VPNVO2W4TBBTFKGA7Z2GZIEQEE/

***
***


Abrams' work to organize voters in Georgia for the 2020 election was massive and successful. Now, the next task for Georgia political organizers needs to be getting blue voters, especially "non-whites", armed. This voter suppression law is only the beginning of the tyranny and violence that will come from the Georgia government and crazed White Supremacists.

The Republican party openly incites and provides a safe haven for terrorism and has openly declared that overthrowing the US government is part of their political strategy to maintain power at all costs. Since none of the politicians who participated in the Capitol Coup have faced a single consequence for their actions, we can be certain they will try again and again until they are successful--afterall, they face no risk of punishment if they fail and the payoff if they succeed is massive, so why wouldn't they try again? And when the day comes when they succeed in overthrowing the rule of law, things won't look too pretty for all the Americans who will now have a target on their back.

Gun ownership among left-wing Americans is much lower than rightists in the US--meaning White Supremacists can easily slaughter us. For decades they have made clear their desire to do so; the "Storm" prophesized by the QAnon cult, where Trump would have given the signal to begin a massive Soviet-style purge of every liberal, is merely the latest manifestation of this. Quite troublingly, gun ownership among "black" Americans is much lower than even "white" liberals. (Remember this fact the next time you run into a rightist who pushes the stereotype that every "black" person is a murderous criminal, by the way).

56% of red voters have access to a gun, while only 25% of blue voters do. Source.

2013 estimates suggest 46% of "whites" have access to a gun, but only 21% of "blacks" and 17% of "Hispanics". 2017 estimates suggest 36% of "whites" own guns, 24% of "blacks", and 15% of "Hispanics".
 

To add another historic fact, Republican Governor of California Ronald Reagan and other right-wingers began to restrict gun ownership after groups such as the Black Panthers legally exercised their 2nd Amendment duty to bear arms in defiance of government tyranny.

Black Panthers on the steps of the Washington state capitol building to protest gun control laws, 1969. None were arrested for this protest as they were in full compliance with the law. The gun control law was passed and racist tyranny continued, however.


Open carrying of long guns is legal in Georgia without a permit. How long until Georgians start asserting their 2nd Amendment duty to protest tyrannical governments?

Apparently it is not prohibited to carry firearms greater than 150 feet from a polling place in Georgia during an election. The 150 foot distance from a polling place is the same distance within which handing out water is prohibited. Does anyone want to volunteer to hand out water precisely 151 feet away, while open carrying long guns (after double-checking the law to ensure legal compliance)?

Bonus points if you have signs quoting Jesus's commands to give food to the hungry and water to the thirsty or face eternal damnation in hell (see below).

***

Separately, following in Jesus's footsteps, does anyone volunteer to commit an act of civil disobedience by dressing up as Jesus and handing out water to citizens waiting in line to vote? If you are arrested, I imagine the Georgia legal system will understand that your duty to practice your religious beliefs supersedes any shameful legal code which attempts to Unconstitutionally prohibit free expression of religion. Afterall, Jesus tells us that handing out food to the hungry and water to the thirsty is a matter concerning the eternal fate of our souls.

Heck, even Governor Kemp would agree!

"Well, you know, my goal is for us to be a sanctuary state, if you will, for people of faith. I think this pandemic has shown us that, you know, people will overreach especially people in positions of power, and that's not good. I don't think in this republic that we have, or in the state of Georgia, and certainly, that really hasn't happened here but looking around other states it was concerning to me that we shouldn't have any governor or a future governor be able to stop religious services. That's embedded in our Constitution. That's a fundamental rock of this country..."
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2021/february/gov-kemp-tells-news-how-he-plans-to-turn-georgia-into-a-sanctuary-state-for-people-of-faith


I am not from Georgia, but I would recommend anyone who is seriously interested in this to contact Reverend Tim McDonald, as he has heroically expressed his interest in following the teachings of Jesus and leading this movement:

"One influential Black pastor said he thinks the new law is unreasonable and that his church will use it to fire up voters.

“We will make a movement out of that,” said the Rev. Tim McDonald, senior pastor of First Iconium Baptist Church in Atlanta. “You know something is wrong when you can’t give grandma a bottle of water and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.”

McDonald told CNN he is already planning to test the law with some civil disobedience. He said that at a future election his church will dare the police to arrest someone giving water to an elderly person waiting to vote."
https://abc17news.com/politics/national-politics/2021/03/26/its-now-illegal-in-georgia-to-give-food-and-water-to-voters-in-line/


For reference, here is what Jesus had to say about this law:

Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave Me something to drink, I was a stranger and you took Me in, I was naked and you clothed Me, I was sick and you looked after Me, I was in prison and you visited Me.’

Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You something to drink? When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? When did we see You sick or in prison and visit You?’

And the King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.’

Then He will say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave Me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave Me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, I was naked and you did not clothe Me, I was sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’

And they too will reply, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’

Then the King will answer, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for Me.’

And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” -Matthew 25:34-46